The first test (Table 1) is simple compilation; the second one (Table 2) is "best effort".
Machine | Opt. level | ND | N | CPU (sec) | MFLOPS
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP 710 32 MB | 1 | 400 | 200 | 8 | |
(ur) | 400 | 63 | |||
2, 3 | 400 | 200 | 2 | ||
400 | 17 | 8 | |||
| |||||
HP 715/75 64 MB | 1 | 400 | 200 | 5 | |
(jupiter) | 400 | 39 | |||
2, 3 | 400 | 200 | 1 | ||
400 | 12 | 11 | |||
| |||||
SGI Indy R4600/133 SC | 1 | 400 | 200 | 4 | |
64 MB (uranus) | 400 | 37 | |||
2 | 400 | 200 | 1 | ||
400 | 13 | ||||
3 | 400 | 200 | 1 | ||
400 | 13 | 11 | |||
| |||||
SGI Indy R4600/100 PC | 1 | 400 | 200 | ||
32 MB (atlas) | 400 | 47 | |||
2 | 400 | 200 | |||
400 | 15 | ||||
3 | 400 | 200 | 1 | ||
400 | 15 | 10 | |||
SGI Indy R5000/150 SC | 1 | 400 | 200 | ||
64 MB (new uranus) | 400 | ||||
** | 2 | 400 | 200 | ||
400 | 9.5 | ||||
3 | 400 | 200 | 1 | ||
400 | 9 | 14 | |||
Pentium Pro P6/200 | 1 | 400 | 200 | 1 | |
64 MB (f9pc00) | 400 | 6 | |||
2, 3 | 400 | 200 | 0.6 | ||
400 | 4.6 | 28
|
** Compiled on R4600/133 SC.
Increase of the CPU time if we put the summation loop to be innermost:
SGI Indy R4600/133 SC | times 2 |
HP 715/75 | times 3.5 |
Machine | Opt. level | ND | N | CPU (sec) | MFLOPS
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGI Indy R4600/133 SC | all | 400 | 200 | 0.6 | |
64 MB (uranus) * | 400 | 4.2 | 30 | ||
400 | 200 | ||||
401 | 4.1 | 30 | |||
SGI Indy R4600/100 PC | all | 400 | 200 | 0.9 | |
32 MB (atlas) * | 400 | 6.7 | 19 | ||
400 | 200 | ||||
401 | 6.7 | 19 | |||
SGI Indy R5000/150 SC | all | 400 | 200 | 0.32 | 50 |
64 MB (uranus) * ** | 400 | 2.64 | 48 | ||
Pentium Pro P6/200 | all | 400 | 200 | 1.6 | |
64 MB (f9pc00) *1 | 400 | 12.6 | 10
|